Saving Migrants’ Basic Human Rights from Sovereign Rule

Abstract

States cannot legitimately enforce their borders against migrants if dominant conceptions of sovereignty inform enforcement because these conceptions undermine sufficient respect for migrants’ basic human rights. Instead, such conceptions lead states to assert total control over outsiders’ potential cross-border movements to support their in-group’s self-rule. Thus, although legitimacy requires states to prioritize universal respect for basic human rights, sovereign states today generally fail to do so when it comes to border enforcement. I contend that this enforcement could only be rendered legitimate if it was predicated on more desirable conceptions of sovereignty that supported the universal prioritization of basic human rights. Specifically, desirable conceptions would not establish and require absolute state sovereignty over borders as a necessary precondition for true popular self-governance.

Attached PDF:

Attributes

License CC BY
DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055422000028
Type Journal Articles
C-ID POLS 140 - IR

Reviews

Review Saving Migrants’ Basic Human Rights from Sovereign Rule.